Creating Place for Space Inside Out

Changing mass defines locality. Mass is not “located” somewhere, mass localizes everywhere into somewhere(s).
For a place to exist, there has to be something there, otherwise we cannot define that place. Without mass localizing , the potential places are just space and thus the nonlocal absence of mass, and absence of mass is nothing, just as nothing is “the absence of mass”. If there is no mass, there is nothing. And even worse, there is in reference to a place and without mass there is nowhere. This is so remarkably simple your mind will not see it. Perhaps your ears can hear it, but vision will refuse the obvious. If you dare use logic that might help. The above can be easily falsified if there is:

Defined a place x where there is no mass
Place x does not vary in any shape or form
Defined a space y where there is no place x
Space y does not vary in any shape or form

If there is such a place x and/or space y, then I´m wrong. The sooner the better, because then there is a way out of mass. In the meantime I consider my Self equal to waves on water, that is water only moving.
Subjective Self is looking for waves on water. It believes water to have waves.

What are you?
Where are you?

But, you might think, if a place comes into being only when mass appears there, then there is no place for that place because it was just occupied by mass!!! Yessir, that’s correct, as soon as a place can be defined as there, there is mass there.
Position is ALWAYS second to object.
Write that down on a post-it sticker, and wherever you place that will instantly become there.
Before, it was there, where was it?
Now, it is there, there is it!
So you see, mass creates more than just space. It also creates time as well as Q’s&A’s.

There is only mass changed by force.
Change generates Everything.

Imagine a tree being there. Say “There is a tree”. Now say “A tree is there”.
Then look hard at this:
Tree IS there
There IS tree
Tree = There
There = Tree

Do this little exercise until you realize that mass/tree is a verb which localizes there. Do it until you realize that mass is not a noun which is localized in a place within space. If you realize that, you will have more fun reading stuff like this. There is a reason why gravity is considered the greatest of unsolved mysteries in physics. The reason is that not even the most hard core materialistic scientists are materialistic enough. They still believe in nothing as something to figure out.
Well, I have already figured out nothing. I have figured it out of everything. Do you see that?
Nothing is excluded from the Theory of Everything as Essentially Accidental.
This will be almost impossible to grasp, but try logic. How could nothing have anything to do with everything? A lot of academics will tell you that nothing is very important in order to understand everything, and in a way that is true. But they do not know nothing from the objective perspective, only from their subjective perspective. If they knew how objective they really are, there would be a lot of scientific progress, but the immaterial ghost of subjectivity keeps them half blind. Imagine a scientist who knows that his/her discoveries are done by the matter of what is discovered, how likely is that? Nevertheless, that is what eventually will happen, but there will be no one doing it. In reality, someone will be done discovering.
Imagine that, in the moment of discovery, the one discovering is finally done. The process is exactly the same as when the student realizes truth and is enlightened. Light goes up when student goes done.

Everything appears in the moment nothing disappears. That is why best meditation practice is to do nothing. When the doer/subject of nothing finally does absolutely nothing, Everything can be done objectively, and – Boom – there it is; everything as massive change done by force. The doing is done, as it has been all along.

Ok, sorry for the side note. We will have to spend a lot more time on the basics before your light can pop  If you get the basic premises right, the rest comes easy.

Mass localizes Place(s) localizes Space(s)
Mass is therefore the nonlocal conditioning of locality
There is only mass conditioning nowhere into somewhere
There is nowhere outside mass

When looking at the picture, remember that what you see it NOT localized mass, but mass localizing a “there”.
Imagine screen = there, so mass = place.
Again, there is no “place” where “screen” is, there is only “screen”.
Likewise, there is no “here” where “I” am, there is only “I”.
Finally, there is no “in-between space” I and screen, there is just I and screen.
If you forget that, you will get lost in trying to understand the appearent relations.
I’m pretty sure you will, but that’s ok. Subjective Self is bound to get lost because it does not understand the nature of direction. Subjective Self will refuse to be directed by This.
Subjective Self will refuse to be done.

So go do it. Get lost.
I’m done.